Previous Remote Secretary Robin Cook, who stop the Government in dissent at the war with Iraq, has called for the Joined together Countries to be given a focal part in the post-Saddam running of the country He too called for UN overseers to be brou

Previous Remote Secretary Robin Cook, who stop the Government in dissent at the war with Iraq, has called for the Joined together Countries to be given a focal part in the post-Saddam running of the country
He too called for UN overseers to be brought in to check any weapons of mass annihilation found there
And Mr Cook called for an early distribution of the “roadmap” design for peace in the Center East to drive forward a peace process
“I think it is extremely vital in the event that the West is to evade the charge of twofold standards, that we are presently seen to be as dynamic in seeking after peace between Israel what’s more, the Palestinian individuals as we have appeared in getting free of Saddam Hussein,” he said
Mr Cook, who stop at pioneer of the House in dissent at Britain’s contribution in the war, was talking to journalists in Glasgow after meeting senior figures from the city’s Muslim community
After the meeting at Glasgow focal mosque, Mr Cook went on the battle trail in the Govan region for the Scottish Parliament what’s more, nearby elections
He told journalists he had no laments about quitting, no laments that his acquiescence had not driven to the ruin of Tony Blair, what’s more, that he did not consider the war to have been illegal
“I have never accepted that the Prime Serve would set out on a military strife in the event that he had thought it was illegal,” said Mr Cook
“I don’t think the question is regardless of whether or, then again not the military strife was lawful – the question is regardless of whether or, then again not it was legitimate
“For it to be honest to goodness there would have to have been a squeezing what’s more, convincing case for military conflict War ought to too continuously be a last resort I felt in this specific case there were alternatives, what’s more, that there was not an prompt what’s more, convincing case for military action “

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *